Any Problems yet ?Any reason why you didn't go with the nomads ? correct me if i am wrong +25 is less poke then 0 offset
2024 Land Cruiser smallest wheel
- Thread starter WolfgangAlpha
- Start date
That would be -25et that sticks out more than 0et, where as 25et is 25mm further in the wheel well than 0et.
Haha why would you think I would have problems? No problems at all. Haven’t taken the new set up on the trail yet, but I’ll keep you all updated. I didn’t go with the Nomads in 0 offset because they poke out too much on top of the wheel being 8.5” wide.
Are you talking about the Nomad Convoys? (saw them in your wheel fit tests). They offer a +25 offset for satin black, 17x8.5, 6/139.7.
I like the convoys so I was wondering the same ....
just wondering the last wheels i mounted on my taco where good at the shop until i hit a dip in the road turning on a slight incline and got some rub...Im in hawaii so shipping isnt cheap so thanks for the fitment post ....I have a 1958 coming too ........hopefully
You had me worried for a sec. I have yet to put it on the trail with new setup, but so far no issues.just wondering the last wheels i mounted on my taco where good at the shop until i hit a dip in the road turning on a slight incline and got some rub...Im in hawaii so shipping isnt cheap so thanks for the fitment post ....I have a 1958 coming too ........hopefully
So the Nomads that are 17x8.5 clearly fit with the 6x139.7 pattern. What pokes out the least? +25, 0, -10?
Seems like +25 would be best since the wider wheel, correct? To stick out less
+25, 0, -10 in that order. Higher the number, the further in the wheel well. Stock are 60et.
Tried on the nomads +25 & 0. Both stick out way too much for me, but if you like that look go for it.
Attachments
i saw your youtube video and thank you for all your research and work for the forum. You decided on the fiften52s?
Do you have a pic of the nomad +25 poke?
The wheels you chose, Fifteen52 Analog HDs for 6x139.7 show 17x8.0 with ET+25. The only difference with the Nomads is they're 1/2 inch wider. Did they really poke noticeably more than your Analogs?
i think im going to go with the Falken 285/70/r17 Rubitrek A/T (i do mostly highway driving but want something somwhat aggressive but the Wildpeak is too aggressive)''
hoping to do the white Convoy Salt Nomad wheels 17x8.5 in my heritage blue LC
hoping to do the white Convoy Salt Nomad wheels 17x8.5 in my heritage blue LC
This is a screenshot of @ryroam250 video of +25
Attachments
Yes, the .5” at +25 made a big difference. Here is the Nomad 8.5” +25. I would have loved the Nomad wheel but didn’t like the aggressive stance especially on stock suspension.
Attachments
Looks awesome!
I have a question, Ryan.If I went with the Nomads +25 with the same tires you picked (285/70) would there be any rub in your opinion or just more poke?
Just more pokeLooks awesome!
If I went with the Nomads +25 with the same tires you picked (285/70) would there be any rub in your opinion or just more poke?
Let me introduce you to a priceless tool
Alloy Wheel & Tyre Fitment Calculator. Offset, Tyre Stretch and Speedo Error | Will They Fit
Alloy Wheel & tyre fitment calculator - it calculates inset, poke, speedo error, tyre stretch and loads more.
www.willtheyfit.com
Plug in your own figures as needed
Stock wheel +60 and everything closer to 0 pokes out further
Similar threads
