Land Cruiser has a ride problem

teghogh

New member
Mar 2, 2025
16
Media
6
12
socal
Vehicles
landcruiser
Just a background to give you guys some perspective on the expected ride quality, I’ve had just about any offroad suv/ truck from jeep jl/ jk/ gladiator/ Bronco badlands/ raptor / f150 raptor: ram trx, new Land Rover defender , f150 lightning and so on.
90 percent of the above are body on frame, some, and most share the same suspension set up as the land cruiser with solid axles in the back.
The first time I test drove the land cruiser I was genuinely surprised about the ride refinement and expected it to be heads and shoulders above the Bronco badlands and jl but I’d have to say Atleast on low speed upto 40mph I don’t feel a difference between those cars . Every little bump on the road is translated to your body. Freeway driving is generally great . No wandering like the jeep, much better steering, and less noise than both.
From the ride perspective I would put all the trucks mentioned above in the following order
Lightning- f150 raptor/ ram trx/ LR defender/ old gx / Bronco raptor / badlands -Land Cruiser/ gladiator - jl

I know the Lexus gx 550 over tail comes with kdss and magnetic shocks that would solve ride quality issues , but non are also available on base gx550, I wonder how similar that car drives compared to Land Cruiser and if the shocks/ spring set up is the same . I ended up purchasing a 1958 for 51k , in my opinion if you are spending above 60 on any Land Cruiser variant the Lexus is a wiser choice for the reasons mention above .

The other slightly annoying point is the hollow feeling of the doors when opening/ closing. They are the lightest doors I’ve ever handled and feel fragile. I’m not sure what is going on because this feeling is only unique to this car, my wife’s x3 even doesnt feel this way.
Ultimately in my opinion, the Land Cruiser is a direct competitor to Jeep / Bronco/ 4Runners and as long as you know that going in you will not be disappointed. I will 100% take it over those when crossed shopped at the same price without hesitation.
The 4 cyl hybrid , while unrefined, is practical, and cool, and feels like a diesel engine. It does what it is supposed to do- again at 50k price point -
if Toyota wanted it to feel premium they could have easily have the tundra set up that would justify the 60-70k price premium but as is, this truck is nothing more that a practical wrangler which I love- again at 50k price point
 

Attachments

  • IMG_5706.jpeg
    IMG_5706.jpeg
    267.5 KB · Views: 47
I came from a raptor ‘22 37pp. Nothing I have ever owned (Audi BMW Acura)is as smooth as that truck. Definitely a downgrade in ride to the LC, but totally different applications. Luxury trophy truck to rugged offroad crawler is 180 difference IMO. Jury is definitely still out, but in ten years and 200k miles, my hunch is the LC will still be the best of the bunch you list for its intended use.
 
I came from a raptor ‘22 37pp. Nothing I have ever owned (Audi BMW Acura)is as smooth as that truck. Definitely a downgrade in ride to the LC, but totally different applications. Luxury trophy truck to rugged offroad crawler is 180 difference IMO. Jury is definitely still out, but in ten years and 200k miles, my hunch is the LC will still be the best of the bunch you list for its intended use.
Agree but they both have similar suspension set up . Even the Ranger raptor ride is fantastic and plush. I think these shocks / spring set up are just too stiff to control body pitch and roll . I personally would sacrifice some of the latter for better ride
 
I am not the most versed in truck, I mostly own and drive sports cars, (I own multiple BMWs) so maybe I am just not exposed enough to what a truck should drive like, but ime my LC soaks up the bumps very nicely, far far better than most of my BMWs which if one is not careful, enough bumps and ones fillings can come out.

My only complaints with my LC are the somewhat wonky infotainment system and how Toyota's digital menu layout is designed, it just does not make sense in my head.
 
Coming from a Passport Trailsport I can't say my stock 1958 rides any harsher on our potholed, frost heaved Minnesota roads. As for light wt. doors and other quality issues, it's a Toyota not a Lexus.
 
I think the suspension of the LC 250 is outstanding for a stock system. Great articulation and very good at a wide range of environments and use cases.

Of course, something like active dampening or air bags could be smoother but with added weight, complexity, expense and less reliability.

The good news is there will be an almost unlimited amount of after market choices so we can all customize to individual tastes and provide more interesting and helpful content for this chat group. 😀
 
I have no complaints. I love the ride. Even with E-load tires. I've been in cars with softer suspension. Once you're on the trail, you get really tossed around. I didn't buy this hoping for a Cadillac.
 
I find the overall ride quality quite good for what it is, and pretty impressed for the most part. The engineers I feel did a good job of balance between on road manners, and off road articulation. I do think some of the ride quality is dependent on how much weight you are hauling around. A bit more weight, passengers etc., does smooth out some of the bouncy feel when it is just the driver/one front seat passenger, to me though it isn’t a night and day difference. Just my thoughts on the matter.
 
I came from a raptor ‘22 37pp. Nothing I have ever owned (Audi BMW Acura)is as smooth as that truck. Definitely a downgrade in ride to the LC, but totally different applications. Luxury trophy truck to rugged offroad crawler is 180 difference IMO. Jury is definitely still out, but in ten years and 200k miles, my hunch is the LC will still be the best of the bunch you list for its intended use.
I've always admired the Raptor's, what made ya switch?
 
Back
Top