So as the owner of a 1958 with just over 2k miles. I had the chance to hop into a base model with the premium pkg at my local dealership. This one was also made in a different factory. My 1958 was made in Hino japan while this came out of the tahara factory.
Exterior/ paint quality seemed identical. I had a vibrating exterior side mirror and this one has a similar issue, so at this point i figure everyone’s exterior drivers mirror vibrates with some wind and freeway speeds (design flaw).
Interior just blew me away though. Felt like a completely different vehicle. The multi view camera was just amazing quality compared to the 1958. heads up display was cool but probably worthless, but the one most exciting thing were the seats. Having lumbar support and adjustability Is a game changer for those long road trips. Plus memory settings for your SO.
Driving experience felt nearly identical, but i did notice when i pressed on the gas the wheels loss traction off the line. My 1958 never looses traction. This is probably cause this car in particular was equipped with 20 inch wheels. I wouldnt call this a benefit.
In conclusion it was a fun comparison. This model was nearly 13k more than what I paid. I dont think the price difference is justified. If anything, they do make a base model landcruiser with most of these features for 63k which probably would be worth an upgrade over the 1958, but that model is nearly impossible to find at dealerships. As far as factories are concerned. Finally, the lights on the 1958 are also clearly better looking imo. If anything, I wish toyota added more adjustable seats to the 1958.
Exterior/ paint quality seemed identical. I had a vibrating exterior side mirror and this one has a similar issue, so at this point i figure everyone’s exterior drivers mirror vibrates with some wind and freeway speeds (design flaw).
Interior just blew me away though. Felt like a completely different vehicle. The multi view camera was just amazing quality compared to the 1958. heads up display was cool but probably worthless, but the one most exciting thing were the seats. Having lumbar support and adjustability Is a game changer for those long road trips. Plus memory settings for your SO.
Driving experience felt nearly identical, but i did notice when i pressed on the gas the wheels loss traction off the line. My 1958 never looses traction. This is probably cause this car in particular was equipped with 20 inch wheels. I wouldnt call this a benefit.
In conclusion it was a fun comparison. This model was nearly 13k more than what I paid. I dont think the price difference is justified. If anything, they do make a base model landcruiser with most of these features for 63k which probably would be worth an upgrade over the 1958, but that model is nearly impossible to find at dealerships. As far as factories are concerned. Finally, the lights on the 1958 are also clearly better looking imo. If anything, I wish toyota added more adjustable seats to the 1958.
Last edited: